Find the latest bookmaker offers available across all uk gambling sites www.bets.zone Read the reviews and compare sites to quickly discover the perfect account for you.
Advertising
Home / cover / PEPT Rule Against APM in Favor of Tinubu/Shettima

PEPT Rule Against APM in Favor of Tinubu/Shettima

PEPT Rule Against APM in Favor of Tinubu/Shettima

Tinubu PEPTThe Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT) has struck out the Allied Peoples Movement petitions against President Bola Tinubu and his Vice President, Kashim Shettima, for lack of merit.

The PEPT dismissed and described APM’s case filed to nullify Tinubu’s election as “incompetent”.

Advertising

The court held that issues raised by the APM in its petition contained pre-election matters that could only be determined by the Federal High Court.

Chairman of the panel, Justice Haruna Tsammani, read the ruling.

Advertising

The tribunal also dismissed the APM petition against the Independent National Electoral Commission and four others.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE:   Pastor Kumuyi Makes Pledge To Politicians ahead of 2023 election

Listed as 1st to 5th respondents are INEC, All Progressives Congress, Bola Tinubu, Kashim Shettima and Kabiru Masari.

The tribunal ruled on each of the arguments put forward by APM.

Advertising

Tsammani said the petitioners failed to prove their arguments and the petition was void of merits.

The judge also upheld preliminary objections raised by all the Respondents to challenge the competence of the petition.

Tsammani held that since the petition centered on the qualification or otherwise of Tinubu to contest the presidential election, the APM ought to have gone to court within 14 days after Tinubu was nominated by the APC.

Advertising
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE:   West Ham Fine Zouma £250,000 Over Maltreatment Of Pet Cat

He held that since the cause of action bordered on a pre-election matter, the APM lacked the locus standi to challenge Tinubu’s nomination.

Tsammani also held that the law did not allow a political party to query the process adopted by another political party in nominating its candidate.

The judge also held that invalid nomination or double nomination did not qualify as a ground for disqualification in respect of presidential election as provided in sections 131 and 137 of the Constitution.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE:   Confession! What Ghana most powerful Herbalist said about Adeboye, Oyedepo and others' source of power

The PUNCH reports that the APM asked the court to invalidate the votes of the President on the grounds of the double nomination of his vice, Shettima.

The APM argued that at the time Shettima became the vice presidential candidate of the APC, he was also a senatorial candidate in Borno State.

The case of the APM was opened and closed on June 21 after calling one private witness.

– Punch

Advertising

About society_admin

Check Also

Lagos State House of Assembly

Eid-el-Fitr: Speaker Obasa Congratulates Muslims

Eid-el-Fitr: Speaker Obasa Congratulates Muslims – urges patriotism for national prosperity As Nigerian Muslims celebrate ...

Advertising

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertising

Recent Posts

Archives

More News